Science-Based Evidence for Muscle Testing as a Diagnostic Tool

A Personal Conclusion Written for the Non-Believer

I hope I have changed your mind about muscle testing and about the CBA as a whole. I hope that I have given you a launching point from which to begin to conduct your own research, and to address what I feel are obvious glaring issues regarding the debate over muscle testing. You could go on in the searches that I conducted and find a great deal more arguments for and against muscle testing, CRA, chiropractic, etc., etc., and as I said at the beginning, the amount of proof that each individual requires is unique and personal.

So it is possible that the aforementioned discourse has not changed your mind very much in terms of whether you believe in what I am trying to do with you or not. It is largely an argument of semantics and, as I said before, perception. If you perceive applied kinesiology, muscle testing, Contact Reflex Analysis, etc. to be a sham, there's really not much I can do to change your viewpoint.

Anyway, I have to go. It's not that I do not want to give you anymore of my time, but... no, wait, it actually is. You came to me; I did not come to you. You are the one with the problem getting where you want to with your body, not me. And at the end of the day, you will be the one not accomplishing what you said you wanted to accomplish, not me.

You know, its funny, I had a client like you just a few weeks ago arguing with me over the science behind that fact that taking NSAIDs is destructive to the integrity of the gut. That's a pretty well-regarded scientific fact these days, but this client was arguing with me about it, because it is outside of their current perception.

Page: << Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 Next >>